4.8 Article

Mechanically and Chemically Robust Sandwich-Structured C@Si@C Nanotube Array Li-Ion Battery Anodes

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 1985-1994

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn507003z

关键词

Li-ion battery; nanotube; silicon anode; capacity; plastic strain

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-07ER46471]
  2. State Key Project of Fundamental Research for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology of China [2011CB933700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stability and high energy densities are essential qualities for emerging battery electrodes. Because of its high specific capacity, silicon has been considered a promising anode candidate. However, the several-fold volume changes during lithiation and delithiation leads to fractures and continuous formation of an unstable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer, resulting in rapid capacity decay. Here, we present a carbonsiliconcarbon (C@Si@C) nanotube sandwich structure that addresses the mechanical and chemical stability issues commonly associated with Si anodes. The C@Si@C nanotube array exhibits a capacity of similar to 2200 mAh g(1) (similar to 750 mAh cm(3)), which significantly exceeds that of a commercial graphite anode, and a nearly constant Coulombic efficiency of similar to 98% over 60 cycles. In addition, the C@Si@C nanotube array gives much better capacity and structure stability compared to the Si nanotubes without carbon coatings, the ZnO@C@Si@C nanorods, a Si thin film on Ni foam, and C@Si and Si@C nanotubes. In situ SEM during cycling shows that the tubes expand both inward and outward upon lithiation, as well as elongate, and then revert back to their initial size and shape after delithiation, suggesting stability during volume changes. The mechanical modeling indicates the overall plastic strain in a nanotube is much less than in a nanorod, which may significantly reduce low-cycle fatigue. The sandwich-structured nanotube design is quite general, and may serve as a guide for many emerging anode and cathode systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据