4.5 Article

Temperament profiles, major depression, and response to treatment with SSRIs in psychiatric outpatients

期刊

EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 245-249

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.07.006

关键词

Temperament; Inventories; Major depression; Antidepressive agents; Second generation; Therapeutic use

资金

  1. Pirkanmaa Hospital District
  2. Kanta-Hame Hospital District
  3. Finnish Medical Foundation
  4. H. Lundbeck/Finland
  5. Lilly Foundation/Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) is commonly used in adult populations. Our aim was to explore: (1) if there are specific differences in temperament dimensions related to depression in comparison with general population, (2) if the treatment response during the acute phase of major depressive disorder (MDD) is predictable by TCI temperament dimensions. Method: Temperament profiles in 98 MDD patients were compared with a Finnish community sample. The patients were treated with serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for 6 weeks and their temperament profiles were assessed at baseline and endpoint. The harm avoidance (HA) and depression scores at baseline and endpoint were modelled with path analysis. For path modelling, we tested the relationships between different temperament dimensions and depression symptoms and other clinical variables with Mancova model. Results: The HA scores were significantly higher in patients both at baseline and endpoint compared to the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort (NFBC). The patients, and especially males, had slightly higher reward dependency (RD) scores. HA at endpoint explained moderately the Montgomery A sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) endpoint score. HA endpoint score was strongly explained by HA baseline score. Conclusions: HA is associated with risk of and treatment response to depression. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据