4.5 Article

The influence of baseline symptoms and insight on the therapeutic alliance early in the treatment of schizophrenia

期刊

EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 259-267

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.12.015

关键词

Schizophrenia; Psychotherapy; Therapeutic alliance; Prediction; Symptoms; Insight

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GV0618]
  2. BMBF research program Research Networks on Psychotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. - The consistent association between therapeutic alliance and outcome underlined the importance of identifying factors which predict the development of a positive alliance. However, only few Studies have examined the association between pretreatment characteristics and alliance formation in patients with schizophrenia. Objective. - The study examined whether symptoms and insight would predict the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy of schizophrenia. Further, the associations and differences between patient and therapist alliance ratings were studied. Methods. - Eighty patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders received manual-based psychotherapy. Assessment of symptoms and insight was conducted at baseline, and questionnaire-based alliance ratings were obtained three weeks into treatment. Patient and therapist alliance ratings were examined separately. Results. - Patient and therapist alliance ratings were not significantly correlated (r = 0.17). Patient ratings of the alliance were significantly higher than the ratings of their therapists (d = 0.73). More insight in psychosis significantly predicted higher patient ratings of the alliance. Less positive and negative symptoms were significant predictors of higher therapist alliance ratings. Conclusion. - The findings indicate that symptoms and insight have an influence on the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Patients' and therapists' perceptions of the alliance do not seem to demonstrate much convergence. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据