4.7 Article

Polymeric triglyceride analogs prepared by enzyme-catalyzed condensation polymerization

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 793-803

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.11.011

关键词

Candida antarctica Lipase B; Condensation polymerization; Functional polyesters; Oleic diacid; Glycerol; Linoleic acid

资金

  1. Industrial Members of the Biocatalysis and Bioprocessing Center at the Polytechnic Institute of NYU
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unique crosslinkable unsaturated polyesters were prepared by a one-pot lipase-catalyzed copolymerization of crude linoleic acid (LA), glycerol (G) and 1,18-cis-9-octanedecenedioic acid (oleic diacid, OD). The lipase used is Candida antarctica Lipase B (CALB) immobilized on Lewatit (N435). Experiments were conducted to assess N435's efficiency of forming poly(OD-co-G-co-LA) as a function of: (i) LA content in the co-monomer feed and (ii) reaction time. For comonomer feed ratio (OD:G:LA) 1:1:0.67, M-n reached similar to 9500 in 8 h, trisubstituted G-units increased to 64% and monomer was largely depleted. When LA and OD remained in products, a lower temperature thermal decomposition peak at about 280 degrees C was observed in addition to a higher temperature decomposition peak at similar to 475 degrees C. By increasing LA content in the comonomer feed from 1:1:1 to 1:1:1.33, M-n decreased from 11,000 to 6300 while trisubstituted G-units increased from 92 to nearly 100%. Thus, by varying the feed ratio of LA, polymeric triglyceride-type structures were formed with control of chain length and trisubstituted G-unit content. Since G-units may be substituted in various ways with OD and LA, calculations were performed that determined the relative proportion of different substitution patterns in products. A hypothetical structure showing general characteristics of the substitution at glycerol units for one such product is presented. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据