4.7 Article

Impact of crystallinity of poly(lactide) on helium and oxygen barrier properties

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 779-788

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.01.014

关键词

Poly(lactide); Poly(lactic acid); Oxygen permeability; Gas barrier properties; Crystallinity; Rigid amorphous fraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The helium and oxygen gas barrier properties of poly(lactide) were investigated as a function of stereochemistry and crystallinity degree. Poly(L-lactide) and poly(D,L-lactide) films were obtained by extrusion and thermally cold crystallized in either alpha'- or alpha-crystalline form with increasing crystallinity degree. Annealing of the films at low temperatures yielded to alpha'-crystals as well as the creation of a rigid amorphous fraction in the amorphous phase. Unexpectedly, the quantity of the rigid amorphous fraction was highest in poly(L-lactide) crystallized under alpha'-form. Unexpectedly, the gas permeability increased with increasing quantity of alpha'-crystals in poly(L-lactide) and remained constant with increasing quantity of alpha'-crystals in poly(D,L-lactide). A gain in gas barrier properties was obtained upon crystallization at higher temperatures yielding alpha-crystals. The analysis of the oxygen transport parameters, in particular the diffusion and the solubility coefficient showed that the diffusion was accelerated upon crystallization, while the solubility coefficient decreased in an expected manner which led to conclude that it remained constant in the amorphous phase. The acceleration of the diffusion seems to be correlated to the occurrence of the rigid amorphous fraction, which holds larger free volume. To conclude, for optimization of poly(lactide) gas barrier properties by focussing on the decrease of the diffusion coefficient it can be suggested to work with poly(D,L-lactide) and to aim a crystallization in alpha-form avoiding the formation of a rigid amorphous fraction. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据