4.7 Article

Novel DOPO-based flame retardants in high-performance carbon fibre epoxy composites for aviation

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 1081-1089

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.02.008

关键词

Epoxy resin (RTM6); DOPO; Carbon fibre reinforced composites; Mechanical properties; Flame retardancy

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [DFG SCHA 730/10-1, DFG DO 453/6-1, DFG AL 474/14-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two novel, halogen-free, phosphorus-based oligomeric flame retardants are investigated in the commercial epoxy resin RTM6 and similar to 70 wt.% carbon fibre RTM6 composites (RTM6-CF) with respect to pyrolysis and fire behaviour. The flame retardants are based on 9,10-dihydro-9-oxy-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DOPO) units linked to the star-shaped aliphatic ground body tetra-[(acryloyloxy)ethyl] pentarythrit (DOPP), or heterocyclic tris-[(acryloyloxy)ethyl] isocyanurate (DOPI), respectively. The glass transition temperature is reduced by adding DOPP and DOPI, but the mechanical properties of the composites (e.g. interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) and G(c) in mode land II) remain unchanged. Decomposition models are proposed based on mass loss, evolved gas analysis (TG-FTIR) and condensed product analysis (hot stage cell within FTIR). The fire behaviour is investigated comprehensively (UL 94, limiting oxygen index (LOI) and cone calorimeter). Both flame retardants act in the gas phase through flame inhibition and in the condensed phase through charring. The UL 94 of RTM6 is improved from HB to V-1 and V-0; the LOI from 25% to 34-38%. Peak heat release rate (PHRR) and total heat evolved (THE) are lowered by 31-49% and 40-44%, respectively. Adding CF increases the residue, reduces the THE, but suppresses the charring due to RTM6 and flame retardants. Thus the THE of RTM6-CF is reduced by about 25% when DOPI and DOPP are added. However, UL 94: V-0 and LOI of 45% and 48% are achieved with similar to 0.6 wt.% phosphorus. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据