4.7 Article

HyperMacs-long chain hyperbranched polymers: A dramatically improved synthesis and qualitative rheological analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 665-676

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.12.022

关键词

hyperbranched polymer; anionic; macromonometer; dendritic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously reported a novel (albeit modestly successful) strategy for the synthesis of polystyrene HyperMacs-long chain branched analogues of hyperbranched polymers. The building blocks for HyperMacs, AB(2) macromonomers are synthesized by living anionic polymerization and as such are well-defined in terms of molecular weight and polydispersity but the nature of the coupling reaction used to generate the highly branched HyperMacs results in branched polymers with a distribution of molecular weights and architectures. In our previously reported studies the extent of the coupling reaction was significantly hampered by side reactions, however, we report here dramatic improvements to the coupling chemistry which overcome the previously experienced limitations resulting in a fourfold increase in the extent of the coupling reactions. Furthermore we report the effect of the addition of varying amounts of a B-3 core molecule to the coupling reaction and the resultant 'control' of the final molecular weight of the HyperMac. Melt rheology showed polystyrene HyperMacs to be thermorheologically simple, obeying William-Landel-Ferry (WLF) behaviour. HyperMacs showed little evidence for relaxation by reptation and when the molecular weight of the macromonomer was <= M-e, for polystyrene, HyperMacs resemble unentangled polymers below the gel point, despite being well above the entanglement molecular weight for linear polystyrene. Increasing the molecular weight of the macromonomer to substantially above M, seems to introduce some entangled nature to the Hyper-Mac as evidenced by the emergence of a near horizontal plateau in G - the loss modulus. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据