4.7 Article

Methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(valerolactone) diblock polymeric micelles for enhanced encapsulation and protection of camptothecin

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 44, 期 12, 页码 3922-3930

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.09.021

关键词

Poly(ethylene glycol); Poly(valerolactone); Camptothecin; Polymeric micelle

资金

  1. Department of Industrial Technology Ministry of Economic Affairs of the Republic of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amphiphilic block copolymers, methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(valerolactone) (mPEG-b-PVL), were synthesized via ring opening polymerization of delta-valerolactone in the presence of methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (mPEG). The copolymers form micelle-like nanoparticles by their amphiphilic characteristics and their structures were examined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The sizes of nanoparticles ranged from 60 to 120 nm as measured by dynamic light scattering detection, and were larger with higher molecular weight of the copolymers. The Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) of these nanoparticles in water decreased with increasing molecular weight of hydrophobic segment. Stability analysis showed that the micellar solutions maintain their sizes at 37 degrees C for six weeks without aggregation or dissociation. The lyophilization method was better than the evaporation method when camptothecin (CPT) was incorporated to the micelles. The former method yielded higher CPT loading efficiency and lower aggregation. The loading efficiency of CPT could be more than 96% and a steady release rate of CPT was kept for twenty six days. Moreover, the mPEG-b-PVL polymeric micelles offered good protection of CPT lactone form at 37 degrees C for sixteen days. The copolymers showed no cytotoxicity towards L929 mouse muscular cells when incubated for one day. Taken together, the mPEG-b-PVL copolymer has potential to be used for the delivery of CPT or other similar drugs. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据