4.4 Article

Near QED regime of laser interaction with overdense plasmas

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS
卷 223, 期 6, 页码 1069-1082

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2014-02158-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11125526, 11335013, 11374317]
  3. AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0341]
  4. Government of the Russian Federation [14.B25.31.0008]
  5. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [13-02-00886, 13-02-97025]
  6. EU FP7 Eucard-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interaction of laser plulses with intensities up to 10(25) W/cm(2) with overdense plasma targets is investigated via three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations. At these intensities, radiation of electrons in the laser field becomes important. Electrons transfer a significant fraction of their energy to gamma-photons and obtain strong feedbacks due to radiation reaction (RR) force. The RR effect on the distribution of laser energies among three main species: electrons, ions and photons is studied. The RR and electron-positron pair creation are implemented by a QED model. As the laser intensity inreases, the ratio of laser energy coupled to electrons drops while the one for gamma-photons reaches up to 35%. Two distinctive plasma density regimes of the high-density carbon target and low-density solid hydrogen target are identified from the laser energy partitions and angular distributions of photons. The power-laws of absorption efficiency versus laser intensity and the transition of photon divergence are revealed. These show enhanced generation of gamma-photon beams with improved collimation in the relativistically transparent regime. A new effect of transverse trapping of electrons inside the laser field caused by the RR force is observed: electrons can be unexpectedly confined by the intense laser field when the RR force is comparable to the Lorentz force. Finally, the RR effect and different regions of photon emission in laser-foil interactions are clarified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据