4.7 Article

Ratios of helicity amplitudes for exclusive ρ0 electroproduction

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1609-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. DESY
  2. Ministry of Economy
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of Armenia
  4. FWO-Flanders
  5. IWT, Belgium
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  7. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  8. Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung
  9. German Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  10. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  11. Italian Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  12. MEXT
  13. JSPS
  14. G-COE of Japan
  15. Dutch Foundation for Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM)
  16. Russian Academy of Science
  17. Russian Federal Agency for Science and Innovations
  18. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  19. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  20. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  21. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  22. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  23. STFC [ST/J000175/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  24. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J000175/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exclusive rho(0)-meson electroproduction is studied in the HERMES experiment, using a 27.6 GeV longitudinally polarized electron/positron beam and unpolarized hydrogen and deuterium targets in the kinematic region 0.5 GeV2 < Q(2) < 7.0 GeV2, 3.0 GeV < W < 6.3 GeV, and -t' < 0.4 GeV2. Real and imaginary parts of the ratios of the natural-parity-exchange helicity amplitudes T-11 (gamma*(T) -> rho T), T-01 (gamma*(T) -> rho(L)), T-10 (gamma*(L) -> rho(T)), and T1-1 (gamma*(-T) -> rho(T)) to T-00 (gamma*(L) -> rho(L)) are extracted from the data. For the unnatural-parity-exchange amplitude U-11, the ratio vertical bar U-11/T-00 vertical bar is obtained. The Q(2) and t' dependences of these ratios are presented and compared with perturbative QCD predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据