4.7 Article

Measurement of the inclusive ep scattering cross section at low Q 2 and x at HERA

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 625-678

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1128-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, FRG, [05 H11GUA/1, 05 H11PAA/1, 05 H11PAB/9, 05 H11PEA/6, 05 H11VHA/7, 05H11VHB/5]
  2. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  3. UK Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council
  4. FNRS-FWO-Vlaanderen
  5. IISN-IIKW
  6. IWT
  7. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme, Belgian Science Policy.
  8. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [PBS/DESY/70/2006]
  9. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  10. VEGA [2/7062/27]
  11. Swedish Natural Science Research Council
  12. Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic [LC527, INGO-1P05LA259, MSM0021620859]
  13. Swiss National Science Foundation
  14. CONACYT, Mexico [48778-F]
  15. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [1329.2008.2]
  16. European Social Fund
  17. STFC [PP/E006442/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  18. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E006442/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A measurement of the inclusive ep scattering cross section is presented in the region of low momentum transfers, 0.2 GeV2 a parts per thousand currency signQ (2)a parts per thousand currency sign12 GeV2, and low Bjorken x, 5a <...10(-6)a parts per thousand currency signxa parts per thousand currency sign0.02. The result is based on two data sets collected in dedicated runs by the H1 Collaboration at HERA at beam energies of 27.6 GeV and 920 GeV for positrons and protons, respectively. A combination with data previously published by H1 leads to a cross section measurement of a few percent accuracy. A kinematic reconstruction method exploiting radiative ep events extends the measurement to lower Q (2) and larger x. The data are compared with theoretical models which apply to the transition region from photoproduction to deep inelastic scattering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据