4.2 Article

Influence of the temperature on the structure of an amorphous Ni46Ti54 alloy produced by mechanical alloying

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 201-209

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00312-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. LNLS [XPD 2839/04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolution of the local atomic order of an amorphous Ni46Ti54 alloy produced by mechanical alloying as a function of temperature was studied by synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) techniques. XRD measurements at several temperatures (25 degrees C, 350 degrees C, 412 degrees C, 430 degrees C, 450 degrees C and 515 degrees C) were performed and analyzed using the reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) simulations method or the Rietveld refinement procedure. The experimental total structure factor for samples at 25 degrees C and 350 degrees C, which are amorphous in nature, were simulated by using the RMC method, and the local structures of the alloy at both temperatures were determined, indicating a decrease in its density as the temperature increases. At 412 degrees C, the XRD pattern shows a partially crystalline sample, indicating that the crystallization process is in progress. At 430 degrees C, 450 degrees C and 515 degrees C, the XRD measurements indicate the presence of two crystalline phases, NiTi and NiTi2, whose structural parameters (lattice parameters, coherently diffracting domains (CDD) sizes, microstrains and relative amount of phases) were determined using the Rietveld refinement procedure. DSC measurements at different heating rates furnished the crystallization temperature, enthalpy and activation energy of the crystallization process, and these values are similar to those found in other amorphous alloys of the Ni-Ti system. They also showed the existence of a second exothermic process, which was related to diffusive processes in the crystalline phases, which could be associated with the changes in the CDD sizes happening from 450 degrees C to 515 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据