4.5 Article

Schizophrenia, antipsychotics and risk of hip fracture: A population-based analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 872-878

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.04.002

关键词

First-generation antipsychotics (FGA); Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA); Hyperprolactinemia; Dose-response relationship; Anticholinergics; Schizophrenia

资金

  1. H. Lundbeck
  2. Pfizer
  3. Chempaq
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. Astra Zeneca
  6. Lundbeck
  7. Janssen-Cilag
  8. Hemocue
  9. Eli-Lilly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a nationwide study using linkage of Danish hospital registers we examined predictors of hip fracture (ICD-10: S72) in 15,431 patients with schizophrenia (ICD-10: F20 or ICD-8: 295) and 3,807,597 population controls. Shorter education, disability pension, lifetime alcohol abuse, somatic co-morbidity, antipsychotics (IRR=1.19; 95% Cl 1.15-1.24), antidepressant (IRR=1.18; 95% Cl 1.16-1.20), anticholinergics (IRR=1.29; 95% CI 1.22-1.36), benzodiazepines (IRR=1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.08) and corticosteroids (IRR=1.44; 95% CI 1.36-1.53) were significant predictors. In 556 persons with schizophrenia and hip fracture (matched to 1:3 to schizophrenia controls without hip fracture), antipsychotic polypharmacy predicted hip fracture. Analyses among antipsychotic monotherapy patients showed no differential effect of individual antipsychotics. A dose-response relationship of hip fracture and lifetime antipsychotics consumption was found (IRR=1.13 95% CI 1.07-1.19) and both prolactin-increasing and non-prolactin-increasing antipsychotics contributed to the effect. In conclusion, several factors, including complex psychopharmacological treatment, contribute in the prediction of hip fracture in large populations. Preventive strategies should focus attention to severely ill patients with high likelihood of a receiving complex psychopharmacologic treatment and high doses of antipsychotics. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据