4.5 Article

Activation of α7 nicotinic receptors improves phencyclidine-induced deficits in cognitive tasks in rats: Implications for therapy of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 333-343

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.06.003

关键词

Reversal learning; Novel object recognition; alpha 7 nACh receptor; Phencyclidine; Female rat; Cognition; Schizophrenia

资金

  1. University of Bradford-GSK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Nicotinic alpha 7 acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) have been highlighted as a target for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. Aim: To investigate whether the deficits induced by sub-chronic phencyclidine (PCP) in reversal learning and novel object recognition could be attenuated by the selective alpha 7 nAChR full agonist, PNU-282987. Methods: Adult female hooded-Lister rats received sub-chronic PCP (2 mg/kg) or vehicle i.p. twice daily for 7 days, followed by 7 days washout. In cohort 1, PCP-treated rats then received PNU-282987 (5, 10, 20 mg/kg; s.c.) or vehicle and were tested in the reversal-learning task. In cohort 2, PCP-treated rats received PNU-282987 (10 mg/kg; s.c.) or saline for 15 days and were tested in the novel object recognition test on day 1 and on day 15, to test for tolerance. Results: Sub-chronic PCP produced significant deficits in both cognitive tasks (P<0.01-0.001). PNU-282987 attenuated the PCP-induced deficits in reversal learning at 10 mg/kg (P<0.01) and 20 mg/kg (P<0.001), and in novel object recognition at 10 mg/kg on day 1 (P<0.01) and on day 15 (P<0.001). Conclusions: These data show that PNU-282987 has efficacy to reverse PCP-induced deficits in two paradigms of relevance to schizophrenia. Results further suggest that 15-day once daily dosing of PNU-282987 (10 mg/kg s.c.) does not cause tolerance in the rat. This study suggests that activation of alpha 7 nAChRs, may represent a suitable strategy for improving cognitive deficits of relevance to schizophrenia. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据