4.5 Article

Repeated low dose of phencyclidine administration impairs spatial learning in mice:: Blockade by clozapine but not by haloperidol

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 486-497

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.12.001

关键词

phencyclidine; schizophrenia; mice; cognitive function; clozapine; hatoperidol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of phencyclidine (PCP), a non-competitive N-methyt-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, was examined in the water maze, a spatial learning and memory task dependent on hippocampal functions. Mate adult C57Bl/6J mice received daily (s.c.) injections of either saline or PCP (0.25-4.0 mg/kg) for 12 days. During the last 5 days, the injections were followed by water maze training. Repeated PCP treatments disrupted spatial learning and memory in the 0.5-4.0 mg/kg dose range. Severe sensorimotor disturbances, observed at the 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg doses of PCP, precluded further swim maze testing. The 0.5 mg/kg but not the 1.0 mg/kg dose of PCP impaired spatial learning and memory without any apparent sensorimotor deficits. PCP, at 1.0 mg/kg, produced impairment in non-spatial learning in the swim maze task and motor disturbances in the rotarod test. Repeated daily treatment with either the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) or the typical antipsychotic drug haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg i.p.) failed to influence spatial performances. The spatial impairment caused by the 0.5 mg/kg dose of PCP was blocked by concomitant treatment with clozapine (0.5 mg/kg), but not with hatoperidol (0.05 mg/kg). The results suggest that it is possible, at tow doses of PCP, to dissociate the spatial Learning impairment in the water maze from the adverse behavioral effects of NMDA receptor blockade. This model may provide a basis for the analysis of the mechanisms underlying declarative memory disturbances in schizophrenia and the differences in mechanisms between typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. and ECNR All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据