4.8 Article

The Nucleation and Growth Mechanism of Thiolate-Protected Au Nanoclusters

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 137, 期 50, 页码 15809-15816

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b09466

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21290192, 21273102]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21373176, 21422305]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [12JJ1003]
  4. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [13A100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The understanding of the evolution mechanism of thiolate-protected Au nanoclusters from the homoleptic Au(I)-SR clusters to core-stacked ones is crucial for the synthesis of novel thiolated Au clusters. In this work, the global search for a series of intermediate Au-m(SR)(n) clusters with m and n ranging from 5 to 12 was implemented by combining basin hopping algorithm, genetic algorithm, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Most of Au-m(SR)(n) clusters possess the core shell structure. Specifically, some typical topologies, such as tetrahedral Au-4, triangular bipyramid Au-5, octahedral Au-6, and vertex-shared Au-7, are found to be dominant within the inner core of various clusters. Along with the increase in the number of gold atoms and thiolates, the preliminary nucleation and growth processes of both inner-core and staple-motif protecting units are grouped into three kinds of size evolution routes, i.e., core growth, core dissolution, and staple-motif growth, respectively. Some metastable isomers may also play an important role in the evolution of clusters. The core structures in the lowest-lying isomers and some metastable isomers are similar to the intact or part of the cores found in experimentally detected species. Both the lowest-lying and metastable intermediate clusters may serve as the building block for the further growth. These results rationalize the preliminary nucleation in the reduction growth stage, shedding light on the size-evolution mechanism of RS-AuNPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据