4.3 Article

Sex-driven differences in Egyptian mongoose's (Herpestes ichneumon) diet in its northwestern European range

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 293-299

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-008-0248-x

关键词

Feeding habits; Management implications; Portugal

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia and Fundo Social Europeu [PRAXIS/PCNA/C/BIA/105/96, SFRH/BPD/14435/2003, SFRH/BPD/35842/2007]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/14435/2003, SFRH/BPD/35842/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sexual dimorphism in carnivores can result from, or induce, variations in diet and foraging behaviour between individuals of different sexes. Sex-driven behavioural changes in feeding habits may also result in a reduction in intraspecific competition for resources, avoiding dietary overlap by concentrating on different prey sizes/types. We therefore evaluated the variation in feeding habits of both males and females of an invasive and range expanding southern European carnivore, the Egyptian mongoose (Herpestes ichneumon), through gut content analysis of road or predator-control killed animals. The analysis of 59 gut samples, collected in Portugal, revealed that northwestern populations of mongooses prey mostly upon mammals [especially lagomorphs, percentage of biomass (PB) = 44%], reptiles (PB = 28%) and arthropods (PB = 2% but percentage of occurrence = 35%). However, females seem to focus mainly on reptiles (PB = 51%) and mammals (PB = 38%), whilst males consume mostly mammals (PB = 75%). The results suggest that this variation maybe a result of sexual dimorphism (since some variation is documented in a few Egyptian mongoose's skull measures, namely condylobasal length and canine diameter), with males shifting their diets to prey from which they can obtain more energy. Females seem to be focused on predating lighter animals, probably females or juveniles, a fact that has important game management implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据