The Benefits of EVAR Planning Using a 3D Workstation

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of planning endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a three-dimensional (3D) workstation on early and midterm outcomes. Methods: All patients undergoing infrarenal EVAR performed between 2006 and 2009 at our institution were included in the current study. Prior to 2008 (group 1), endograft sizing was performed by interrogation of computed tomography angiography axial images. After 2008 (group 2), endograft sizing was routinely performed using a 3D workstation (Aquarius, Terarecon), allowing for multiplanar reconstruction and centerline analysis. Pre-, perk, postoperative, and follow-up data were prospectively entered in an electronic database. All postoperative complications and subsequent secondary interventions depicted during the 2-year period following EVAR were compared. Secondary intervention and mortality rates were defined at 2 years and compared. Freedom from secondary intervention and overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method during follow-up and compared by log-rank test. Results: A total of 295 patients (149 patients in group 1 and 146 patients in group 2) were included. All patients had completed a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. During this 2-year period following EVAR, the type 1 endoleak rate was 8.7% in group 1 and 1.4% in group 2 (p=.004) respectively. Secondary intervention rates related to type 1 endoleak was 5.4% in group 1 and 0 in group 2 (p<.001). No difference was observed regarding all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related death, and freedom from secondary intervention rates during follow-up. Conclusion: The routine use of 3D workstations for EVAR planning significantly reduces the rate of type 1 endoleaks and, therefore, the rate of related secondary interventions. (C) 2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.