4.5 Article

Implications of Attendance Patterns in Northern Ireland for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.03.022

关键词

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Screening

资金

  1. ESRC [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Evidence supports the introduction of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme. The aims of this study were to estimate future disease patterns and to determine the effect of the proportion attending on the programme's cost-effectiveness. Patients and methods: The results of the local AAA screening programme were reviewed. Ultrasonic infrarenal aortic diameter of 30 mm was considered aneurysmal. Projected population numbers from the Department of Health and current disease prevalence were used to estimate future number of potential patients. The Multi-centre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) Markov model was used to calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and 95% uncertainty intervals (UI), using a 30-year time horizon and 3.5% per annum discount, to determine the effect of attendance. Results: Men were recruited from August 2004 to May 2010. 13316 were invited for a scan and 5931 (44.5%) attended. 321 AAA were diagnosed, giving a prevalence of 5.4%, while 27 large AAA (0.46%) were repaired. The annual incidence of AAA until 2021 will range from 441 to 526, with an incidence of 40-48 large AAA, with both showing a gradual increase with time. Using this attendance rate, the ICER was calculated at 2350 pound per life-year gained (95% UI: 1620- pound 4290) pound, or 3020 pound per quality-adjusted life-year gained (95% UI: 2080- pound 5500) pound. Conclusions: The prevalence of disease in this local AAA screening was similar to other studies. The low attendance will result in many AAA being missed, but will not impact greatly on the long-term cost-effectiveness. (C) 2011 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据