4.5 Article

Elevated Tissue Expression of Thrombomodulatory Factors Correlates with Acute Symptomatic Carotid Plaque Phenotype

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.02.020

关键词

Carotid plaque; Atherosclerosis; Thrombomodulation; Plaque instability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Thrombomodulatory factors have been implicated in plaque instability. The aim was to examine the relationship between thrombomodulatory gene expression, timing of clinical events and plaque histology. Design of Study: Plaques were obtained from 40 consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and divided into three groups (group 1, early symptomatic, within 1 month; group 2, late symptomatic, 1-6 months and group 3, asymptomatic). Total RNA was isolated to determine the expression of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), urokinase plasminogen activator (u-PA), plasminogen activator inhibtor-1 (PAI-1), tissue factor (TF), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), thrombomodulin (TM), CD68 and vascular endothelial-cadherin (VE-Cadherin). Results: Expression of t-PA, PAI-1, TF, TFPI, TM, CD68 and VE-cadherin were significantly increased in the early symptomatic group (p = 0.019, 0.028, 0.018, 0.025, 0.038, 0.016 and 0.027 respectively), but the level of gene expression in the late symptomatic group was indistinguishable from the asymptomatic group. The incidence of plaque rupture and intraplaque haemorrhage was significantly increased in the early symptomatic groups (58% versus 18%/18% group 2/3, and 55% versus 6%/9% respectively, p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: Expression of thrombomodulatory genes is increased in unstable plaques, though levels after 1 month are comparable to asymptomatic plaques. This transient rise may influence plaque instability, and rapid resolution mirrors the clinical reduction in risk of further thromboembolic events. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据