4.4 Article

Comparison of physical and technical performance in European soccer match-play: FA Premier League and La Liga

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 51-59

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2010.481334

关键词

Football; motion analysis; technique; sprinting; notational analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to compare match performance in professional soccer players across two major European championships: Spanish La Liga and English FA Premier League (FAPL). Data were collected using a computerized match analysis system. A total of 5938 analyses were recorded during the 2006-2007 season. The players were classified into six positional roles: central defenders, full backs, central defensive midfielders, wide midfielders, central attacking midfielders, and forwards. The match performance variables analysed included: (i) physical activity - total distance covered, distances covered at high-intensities both with and without possession of the ball; (ii) technical actions - heading and ground duels, passing, time in possession, and ball touches. Comparison of the total distance covered by FAPL and La Liga players showed no difference across individual playing positions but FAPL players generally covered greater distances in sprinting. In contrast, more of the total distance in sprinting was covered by La Liga players when their team was in possession (values from P 0.05 to P 0.001), while an equal total sprint distance, irrespective of possession, was observed in FAPL players. La Liga players won more heading duels (49.32% vs. 48.68%) and performed the same proportion of successful passes (76.17%). FAPL wide midfielders had similar to 20% more ball touches per possession than their La Liga counterparts (2.24 +/- 0.54 vs. 2.03 +/- 0.55, P 0.001). In conclusion, our results show that FAPL and La Liga teams present differences in various physical and technical aspects of match-play, suggesting that cultural differences may exist across professional soccer leagues and playing positions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据