4.8 Article

Time-Resolved Detection and Analysis of Single Nanoparticle Electrocatalytic Impacts

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 137, 期 34, 页码 10902-10905

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05856

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2009-AdG 247143-QUANTIF]
  2. University of Warwick Chancellor's International Scholarship
  3. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A6A3A03039226]
  4. EPSRC through MOAC Doctoral Training Centre [EP/F500378/1]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1229084] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A6A3A03039226] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is considerable interest in understanding the interaction and activity of single entities, such as (electro)catalytic nanoparticles (NPs), with (electrode) surfaces. Through the use of a high bandwidth, high signal/noise measurement system, NP impacts on an electrode surface are detected and analyzed in unprecedented detail, revealing considerable new mechanistic information on the process. Taking the electrocatalytic oxidation of H2O2 at ruthenium oxide (RuOx) NPs as an example, the rise time of current time transients for NP impacts is consistent with a hydrodynamic trapping model for the arrival of a NP with a distance-dependent NP diffusion-coefficient. NP release from the electrode appears to be aided by propulsion from the electrocatalytic reaction at the NP. High-frequency NP impacts, orders of magnitude larger than can be accounted for by a single pass diffusive flux of NPs, are observed that indicate the repetitive trapping and release of an individual NP that has not been previously recognized. The experiments and models described could readily be applied to other systems and serve as a powerful platform for detailed analysis of NP impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据