4.8 Article

Self-Assembly of a Functional Oligo(Aniline)-Based Amphiphile into Helical Conductive Nanowires

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 137, 期 45, 页码 14288-14294

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b06892

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/J500379/1]
  2. ERC [20110209]
  3. Academy of Finland
  4. EPSRC Grant Atoms to Applications [EP/K035746/1]
  5. EPSRC grant [EP/K03927X/1]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BR 4346/1-1]
  7. EPSRC [EP/K03927X/1, EP/K035746/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K03927X/1, 1100689, EP/K035746/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tetra(aniline)-based cationic amphiphile, TANI-NHC(O)C5H10N(CH3)(3)Br+ (TANI-PTAB) was synthesized, and its emeraldine base (EB) state was found to self-assemble into nanowires in aqueous solution. The observed self-assembly is described by an isodesmic model, as shown by temperature-dependent UV-vis investigations. Linear dichroism (LD) studies, combined with computational modeling using time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT), suggests that TANI-PTAB molecules are ordered in an antiparallel arrangement within nanowires, with the long axis of TANI-PTAB arranged perpendicular to the nanowire long axis. Addition of either S- or R- camphorsulfonic acid (CSA) to TANI-PTAB converted TANI to the emeraldine salt (ES), which retained the ability to form nanowires. Acid doping of TANI-PTAB had a profound effect on the nanowire morphology, as the CSA counterions chirality translated into helical twisting of the nanowires, as observed by circular dichroism (CD). Finally, the electrical conductivity of CSA-doped helical nanowire thin films processed from aqueous solution was 2.7 mS cm(-1). The conductivity, control over self-assembled 1D structure and water-solubility demonstrate these materials promise as processable and addressable functional materials for molecular electronics, redox-controlled materials and sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据