4.5 Article

Modelling long-term carbon dynamics in soils reconstituted with large quantities of organic matter

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 787-797

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01494.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. ADEME (Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maitrise de l'Energie), the Region Pays de la Loire and AGROCAMPUS OUEST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In urban conditions, the widescale availability of organic matter to be recycled and the necessity for soil reconstitution (Technosol) has led to the input of very large quantities of organic matter (up to 50% v/v). The long-term degradation of these large quantities of organic matter in the soil is not well known. We monitored, over a 60-month period, the total carbon (C) content and the particulate and biochemical fractions of reconstituted soils placed in 600-litre boxes under natural conditions. The top layer was a sandy loam amended with 20 or 40% of sphagnum peat or organic compost (sewage sludge, wood chip compost or green waste compost) lying on a layer of sandy loam. We measured C mineralization over time under controlled conditions and built a long-term model to simulate carbon dynamics where exogenous organic carbon (EOC) was divided into two biodegradable compartments. The model yielded the proportions of EOC that either resisted degradation or contributed to soil organic C storage by mineralization and/or humification. Organic matter degradation was linked to its maturity and to its contents in certain particulate and biochemical fractions but was independent of how much of a given organic matter was introduced. We found a good correlation between the degradable organic compartment and the lignin and cutin-like, hemicellulose and cellulose-like fractions larger than 1 mm. The model showed that a large part of initial EOC was still present in the soil after 5 years in a potentially biodegradable but resistant compartment. The degradation of that compartment by mineralization or humification is therefore expected to take longer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据