4.5 Article

Regulating mineral N release and greenhouse gas emissions by mixing groundnut residues and rice straw under field conditions

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 640-652

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01021.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Groundnut as a pre-rice crop is usually harvested 1-2 months before rice transplanting, during which much of legume residue N released could be lost. Our objectives were to investigate the effect of mixing groundnut residues (GN, 5 Mg ha(-1)) with rice straw (RS) in different proportions on: (i) regulating N dynamics, (ii) potential microbial interactions during decomposition, and (iii) associated nitrous oxide and methane emissions at weekly intervals during the lag phase until rice transplanting (i, ii) or harvest (iii). Decomposition was fastest in groundnut residues (64% N lost) with a negative interaction for N loss when mixed 1:1 with rice straw. Adding groundnut residues increased mineral N initially, while added rice straw led to initial microbial N immobilization. Mineral N in mixed residue treatments was significantly greatest at the beginning of rice transplanting. Soil microbial N and apparent efficiency were higher, while absolute and relative microbial C were often lowest in groundnut and mixed treatments. Microbial C:N ratio increased with increasing proportion of added rice straw. N2O losses were largest in the groundnut treatment (12.2 mg N2O-N m(-2) day(-1)) in the first week after residue incorporation and reduced by adding rice straw. N2O-N emissions till rice harvest amounted to 0.73 g N2O-N m(-2) in the groundnut treatment. CH4 emissions were largest in mixed treatments (e.g. 155.9 g CH4 m(-2), 1:1 treatment). Mixing residues resulted in a significant interaction in that observed gaseous losses were greater than predicted from a purely additive effect. It appears possible to regulate N dynamics by mixing rice straw with groundnut residues; however, at a trade-off of increased CH4 emissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据