4.5 Article

Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in particle-size separates and density fractions of typical agricultural soils in the Yangtze River Delta, east China

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 1020-1026

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01066.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40432005]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX3-SW-429]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2002CB4108010]
  4. K. C. Wong Education Foundation (Hong Kong)
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2007J0124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil organic matter can be divided into different organic carbon (C) pools with different turnover rates. The organic pollutants in soils associated with these organic C pools may have different bioavailability and environmental risks during the decomposition of soil organic matter. We studied the distribution patterns of 15 USEPA priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in different particle-size separates (clay, fine silt, coarse silt, fine sand and coarse sand) and density fractions (light and heavy fractions) of nine agricultural topsoils (0-20 cm depth) from a contaminated area in the Yangtze River Delta region of east China. There was a decreasing trend in PAH concentration in particle-size separates with decreasing particle size. However, the different particle-size separates had similar PAH composition. The concentration of PAHs in the light fraction ranged from 13 037 to 107 299 mu g kg(-1), far higher than in the heavy fraction, which ranged from 222 to 298 mu g kg(-1). Although the light fraction accounted for only 0.4-2.3% of the soils, it was associated with 31.5-69.5% of soil PAHs. The organic matter in coarse silt had the strongest capacity for enrichment with PAHs. Combining the distributions of PAHs and the turnover rates of organic matter in different soil fractions, the environmental risks of PAH-polluted soils may be due mainly to the PAHs associated with sand and the light fraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据