4.6 Article

Soil phosphorus composition determined by 31P NMR spectroscopy and relative phosphatase activities influenced by land use

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 73-77

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.07.001

关键词

Land use; Soil phosphorus composition; Solution P-31 NMR spectroscopy; Soil phosphatase activities

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB100504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41171241]
  3. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2012BAD14B04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Land use can alter the phosphorus (P) pool in soil. Understanding detailed P changes derived from different land uses is important for sustainable development of soil resources. However, soil P composition and phosphatase activities under different land uses in temperate regions remain widely unknown. Soils from four types of land use, including cultivated (Maize and Paddy) and uncultivated (Woodland and Fallow) soils, in the same region were selected to characterize soil P composition using solution P-31 nuclear magnetic resonance (P-31 NMR) spectroscopy. Four soil phosphatase activities, acid phosphomonoesterase (AcP), alkaline phosphomonoesterase (Alp), phosphodiesterase (PD) and pyrophosphatase (PY), were also considered. The results showed that the proportions of dominated inorganic orthophosphate were higher in cultivated soils than in uncultivated soils, while the opposite trend was observed for organic orthophosphate monoesters and diesters. Generally, soil phosphatase activities were higher in uncultivated soils than in cultivated soils. The multivariate analysis indicates that soil P composition as well as phosphatase activity was significantly influenced by land use. The correlation analysis showed that soil AcP and PY activities were positively correlated with soil monoester and pyrophosphate, respectively, and were negatively correlated with soil available P. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据