4.5 Article

Social support and the likelihood of maintaining and improving levels of physical activity: the Whitehall II Study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 514-518

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr091

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0902037]
  2. British Heart Foundation [RG/07/008/23674]
  3. Health and Safety Executive
  4. Department of
  5. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, US, NIH [R01HL036310]
  6. National Institute on Aging, US, NIH [R01AG013196, R01AG034454]
  7. Agency for Health Care Policy Research [HS06516]
  8. John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation Research Networks on Successful Midlife Development and Socio-economic Status and Health
  9. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [RES-000-22-3489]
  10. Health and Safety Executive (HSE), UK
  11. Sheffield Hallam University, UK
  12. Yorkshire & Humberside SHA, UK
  13. Babcock International Group plc., UK
  14. European Agency for Health and Safety
  15. Economic and Social Research Council [ESRC RES 070-27-0034]
  16. British Heart Foundation
  17. MRC Research Professorship
  18. Academy of Finland [124 322, 124 271, 132 944, 128 089]
  19. EU New OSH ERA research programme
  20. BUPA Foundation, UK [22094477]
  21. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [R01 HL036310-20A2]
  22. National Institute on Aging, NIH, US [R01AG034454]
  23. Finnish Work Environment Fund [109 395]
  24. European Science Foundation
  25. National Institute on Aging, NIH [R01AG013196, R01AG034454]
  26. British Heart Foundation [RG/07/008/23674] Funding Source: researchfish
  27. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007438/1, ES/G039070/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  28. Medical Research Council [G19/35, G8802774, MC_U123092720, G0902037, G0100222] Funding Source: researchfish
  29. ESRC [ES/G039070/1, ES/G007438/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  30. MRC [G0902037, MC_U123092720] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Evidence on the association between social support and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) is scarce and mostly based on cross-sectional data with different types of social support collapsed into a single index. The aim of this study was to investigate whether social support from the closest person was associated with LTPA. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 5395 adults (mean age 55.7 years, 3864 men) participating in the British Whitehall II study. Confiding/emotional support and practical support were assessed at baseline in 1997-99 using the Close Persons Questionnaire. LTPA was assessed at baseline and follow-up in (2002-04). Baseline covariates included socio-demographics, self-rated health, long-standing illnesses, physical functioning and common mental disorders. Results: Among participants who reported recommended levels of LTPA at baseline, those who experienced high confiding/emotional support were more likely to report recommended levels of LTPA at follow-up [odds ratio (OR): 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.70 in a model adjusted for baseline covariates]. Among those participants who did not meet the recommended target of LTPA at baseline, high confiding/emotional support was not associated with improvement in activity levels. High practical support was associated with both maintaining (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.63) and improving (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.53) LTPA levels. Conclusion: These findings suggest that emotional and practical support from the closest person may help the individual to maintain the recommended level of LTPA. Practical support also predicted a change towards a more active lifestyle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据