4.2 Article

The influence of fundamental design parameters on ciliates community structure in Irish activated sludge systems

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROTISTOLOGY
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 274-286

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejop.2011.05.001

关键词

Protozoa; Indicator; Wastewater treatment; BNR systems; Anoxia; Anaerobia

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [07/RFP/EEEOBF117]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [07/RFP/EEEOBF117] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protozoan community in eleven activated sludge wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the greater Dublin area has been investigated and correlated with key physio-chemical operational and effluent quality parameters. The plants represented various designs, including conventional and biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems. The aim of the study was to identify differences in ciliate community due to key design parameters including anoxic/anaerobic stages and to identify suitable bioindicator species for performance evaluation. BNR systems supported significantly different protozoan communities compared to conventional systems. Total protozoan abundance was reduced in plants with incorporated anoxic and anaerobic stages, whereas species diversity was either unaffected or increased. Plagiocampa rouxi and Holophrya discolor were tolerant to anoxic/anaerobic conditions and associated with high denitrification. Apart from process design, influent wastewater characteristics affect protozoan community structure. Aspidisca cicada was associated with low dissolved oxygen and low nitrate concentrations, while Trochilia minuta was indicative of good nitrifying conditions and good sludge settleability. Trithigmostoma cucullulus was sensitive to ammonia and phosphate and could be useful as an indicator of high effluent quality. The association rating assessment procedure of Curds and Cockburn failed to predict final effluent biological oxygen demand (BOD5) indicating the method might not be applicable to treatment systems of different designs. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据