4.8 Article

Multiple Redox Modes in the Reversible Lithiation of High-Capacity, Peierls-Distorted Vanadium Sulfide

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 137, 期 26, 页码 8499-8508

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b03395

关键词

-

资金

  1. Schlumberger Stichting Fund
  2. European Research Council (EU ERC)
  3. California Nanosystems Institute [NSF CNS-0960316]
  4. Hewlett-Packard
  5. Materials Research Laboratory [DMR-1121053]
  6. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vanadium sulfide VS4 in the patronite mineral structure is a linear chain compound comprising vanadium atoms coordinated by disulfide anions [S-2](2-). V-51 NMR shows that the material, despite having V formally in the d(1) configuration, is diamagnetic, suggesting potential dimerization through metal metal bonding associated with a Peierls distortion of the linear chains. This is supported by density functional calculations, and is also consistent with the observed alternation in V V distances of 2.8 and 3.2 angstrom along the chains. Partial lithiation results in reduction of the disulfide ions to sulfide S2-, via an internal redox process whereby an electron from V4+ is transferred to [S-2](2-) in oxidation of V4+ to V5+ and reduction of the [S-2](2-) to S2- to form Li3VS4 containing tetrahedral [VS4](3-) anions. On further lithiation this is followed by reduction of the V5+ in Li3VS4 to form Li3+xVS4 (x = 0.5-1), a mixed valent V4+/V5+ compound. Eventually reduction to Li2S plus elemental V occurs. Despite the complex redox processes involving both the cation and the anion occurring in this material, the system is found to be partially reversible between 0 and 3 V. The unusual redox processes in this system are elucidated using a suite of short-range characterization tools including V-51 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), S K-edge X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES), and pair distribution function (PDF) analysis of X-ray data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据