4.7 Review

How ORAI and TRP channels interfere with each other: Interaction models and examples from the immune system and the skin

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 739, 期 -, 页码 49-59

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.10.071

关键词

ORAI1; STIM1; TRPC; T lymphocytes; keratinocytes; Melanocytes

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. [SFB 894]
  3. [SFB 1027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four types of Ca2+ selective ion channels are known, ten voltage gated Ca2+ (Ca-v) channels, four CatSper channels, three store operated CRAC channels (ORAI channels) and at least two members of the TRPV subfamily (TRPV5, TRPV6). Some of the other TRP channels also show some Ca2+ selectivity like certain splice variants of TRPM3. In addition to Ca2+ selective channels, various cation channels play an important role for Ca2+ entry and furthermore, they may also regulate Ca2+ entry through other channels by modulating the membrane potential or other means as outlined in this review. Of the different types of cation channels, TRP channels form one of the most prominent families of non-selective cation channels with functional relevance in electrically non-excitable and electrically excitable cell types. Among these, the seven channels of the TRPC subfamily are rather non-selective with very modest Ca2+ selectivity, whereas in the other subfamilies, cation selectivity ranges from monovalent selectivity (i.e. TRPM4, TRPM5) to divalent selectivity (i.e. TRPM6, TRPM7) or Ca2+ selectivity (i.e. TRPV5, TRPV6). Rather than discussing the heavily reviewed individual functions of ORAI or TRP channels, we summarize data and present models how TRP and ORAI may functionally interact to guide cellular functions. We focus on T lymphocytes representing a more ORAI-dominated tissue and skin as model system in which both ORAI and TRP channel have been reported to control relevant functions. We present several interaction models how ORAI and TRP may interfere with each other's function. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据