4.7 Article

Topically applied substance P enhanced healing of open excision wound in rats

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 715, 期 1-3, 页码 345-353

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.04.042

关键词

Wound healing; Substance P; TNF-alpha; IL-10; VEGF; TGF-beta(1)

资金

  1. CSIR (New Delhi)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significant social and financial burden due to wounds need newer drugs/formulations to speed up the healing process. Substance P (SP), a neuropeptide, is associated with release of various cytokines and growth factors from inflammatory, epithelial and endothelial cells. In the present study, temporal effects of topically applied SP (10(-7) M in normal saline) were evaluated in the modulation of various cytokines and growth factors that participate in cutaneous wound healing. Gross examination of full thickness open excision wound in rats revealed that once daily topical application of SP significantly increased the wound closure, as compared to control group. SP treatment significantly increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and decreased interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels on day 3. On the contrary, on day 7 level of TNF-alpha decreased and that of IL-JO increased. The mRNA and protein expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-beta(1) (TGF-beta(1)) increased on clays 3 and 7, and decreased on day 14 in SP-treated wounds. Histopathological evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin stained wound sections showed that SP treatment produced increased early leukocytes infiltration, fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis, collagen deposition and re-epithelialization. Results of the present study demonstrate that topical application of SP enhanced wound healing by modulating cytokines, growth factors and cells. Based on the results, it is suggested that SP could be of beneficial use in diabetic wounds where levels of VEGF, TGF-beta(1) and SP decrease along with impairment of inflammatory reaction. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据