4.7 Article

Antagonist profile of ibodutant at the tachykinin NK2 receptor in guinea pig isolated bronchi

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 720, 期 1-3, 页码 180-185

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.10.029

关键词

Ibodutant; MEN15596; NK2 antagonist; NANC contraction; Bronchi; Guinea pig

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study we have characterized the pharmacological profile of the non-peptide tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist ibodutant (MEN15596) in guinea pig isolated main bronchi contractility. The antagonist potency of ibodutant was evaluated using the selective NK2 receptor agonist [beta Ala(8)] NKA(4-10)-mediated contractions of guinea pig isolated main bronchi. In this assay ibodutant (30, 100 and 300 nM) induced a concentration-dependent rightward shift of the [beta Ala(8)]NKA(4-10) concentration-response curves without affecting the maximal contractile effect. The analysis of the results yielded a Schild-plot linear regression with a slope not different from unity (0.95, 95% c.l. 0.65-1.25), thus, indicating a surmountable behavior. The calculated apparent antagonist potency as pK(B) value was 8.31 +/- 0.05. Ibodutant (0.3-100 nM) produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the nonadrenergic-noncholinergic (NANC) contractile response induced by electrical held stimulation (EFS) of intrinsic airway nerves in guinea pig isolated main bronchi. At the highest concentration tested (100 nM) ibodutant almost abolished the EES-induced bronchoconstriction (95 +/- 4% inhibition), the calculated IC50 value was 2.98 nM (95%, c.l. 1.73-5.16 nM). In bronchi from ovalbumin (OVA) sensitized guinea pigs ibodutant (100 nM) did not affect the maximal contractile response to OVA, but completely prevented the slowing in the fading of the motor response induced by phosphoramidon pretreatment linked to the endogenous neurokinin A release. Altogether, the present study demonstrates that ibodutant is a potent NK2 receptor antagonist in guinea pig airways. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据