4.7 Article

AMP-activated kinase relaxes agonist induced contractions in the mouse aorta via effects on PKC signaling and inhibits NO-induced relaxation

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 695, 期 1-3, 页码 88-95

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.07.025

关键词

AICAR; AMPK; Mouse; PKC; NO; SNP

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Karolinska Institutet
  3. FP7 EU grant (INComb)
  4. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenosine monophosphate activated kinase (AMPK), a regulator of cellular metabolism, has been shown to relax arterial smooth muscle via endothelium-dependent and independent mechanisms. We have examined the role of AMPK in different smooth muscles using the activating compound, 5-amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide riboside-1-beta-ribofuranoside (AICAR). Isolated preparations of mouse aorta, saphenous artery, ileum and urinary bladder were compared. AICAR produced a reversible dose-dependent relaxation in aortic rings pre-incubated with AICAR and activated with phenylephrine. Less prominent relaxation was noted in the other tissues. This difference in sensitivity to AICAR was not due to differences in the expression levels of AMPK alpha 1 mRNA. In the aorta, AICAR had a greater effect on contractions induced by phenylephrine, compared to high-K+ induced contractions. Contractions of the aorta in response to the protein kinase C activator PDBu were prominently inhibited by AICAR. The AICAR relaxation observed in the aorta was not prevented by the NOS inhibitor L-NAME, Indomethacin or endothelium removal. Nitric oxide (NO) mediated relaxations in aortic preparations induced by acetylcholine or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were attenuated by AICAR. In conclusion, AMPK induced relaxation of smooth muscle is tissue-dependent and most prominent in large elastic arteries. The smooth muscle relaxation is NO-independent and occurs downstream of PKC activation and is associated with attenuated relaxant responses to NO. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据