4.7 Article

Coronary response to diadenosine tetraphosphate after ischemia-reperfusion in the isolated rat heart

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 660, 期 2-3, 页码 394-401

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.04.006

关键词

Perfused heart; Purinergic P2Y receptor; Coronary circulation; K-ATP potassium channel; Nitric oxide; Langendorff preparation

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [PS09/00394]
  2. Fundacion Mutua Madrilena [AP57242009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diadenosine tetraphosphate (AP4A) is a vasoactive mediator that may be released from platelet granules and that may reach higher plasma concentrations during coronary ischemia-reperfusion. The objective of this study was to analyze its coronary effects in such conditions. To this, rat hearts were perfused in a Langendorff preparation and the coronary response to Ap4A (10(-7)-10(-5) M) was recorded. In control hearts. Ap4A produced concentration-dependent vasodilatation both at the basal coronary resting tone and after precontracting coronary vasculature with 11-dideoxy-1a,9a-epoxymethanoprostaglandin F-2 alpha (U46619), and this vasodilatation was reduced by reactive blue 2 (2 x 10(-6) M), glibenclamide (10(-5) M), H89(10(-6) M), U73122 (5 x 10(-6) M) and endothelin-1 (10(-9) M), but not by L-NAME (10(-4) M), isatin (10(-4) M), GF109203x (5 x 10(-7) M), or wortmannin (5 x 10(-7) M). After ischemia-reperfusion, the vasodilatation to Ap4A diminished, both in hearts with basal or increased vascular tone, and in this case the relaxation to Ap4A was not modified by reactive blue 2, L-NAME, glibenclamide, isatin, H89. GF109203x or wortmannin, although it was reduced by U73122 and endothelin-1. UTP produced coronary relaxation that was also reduced after ischemia-reperfusion. These results suggest that the coronary relaxation to Ap4A is reduced after ischemia-reperfusion, and that this reduction may be due to impaired effects of K-ATP channels and to reduced response of purinergic P2Y receptors. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据