4.7 Article

Icariin attenuates LPS-induced acute inflammatory responses: Involvement of PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling pathway

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 642, 期 1-3, 页码 146-153

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.05.012

关键词

Icariin; RAW 264.7 macrophages cells; Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/amino kinase terminal (PI3K/Akt); NF-kappa B p65

资金

  1. National Basic Science Program of China [2009CB523000]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [2009XD1400700]
  3. China Ministry of Education [200802461053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the mechanism underlying the attenuation of LPS-induced lung inflammation by icariin in vivo and in vitro. The anti-inflammatory effects of icariin on LPS-induced acute inflammatory and the molecular mechanism were investigated. Pretreatment with icarrin (20 mg/kg) could attenuate acute lung inflammation by inhibiting mRNA expressions of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), metalloproteinase cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in the lung of LPS-treated mice. In addition, icariin suppressed the secretion of TNF-alpha, prostaglandin E2 (PGE(2)) and nitric oxide (NO) as well as NF-kappa B p65 activation. Furthermore, decreased myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity was observed in the lung tissue and LPS-induced cytotoxicity in the RAW 264.7 macrophages cells was also markedly attenuated by icariin. Western blotting analysis and confocal microscopy showed that icariin pretreatment reduced the nucleus transportation and constant level of NF-kappa B p65 in the RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. However, the protective effects of icariin were reversed by a PI3K/Akt inhibitor (wortmannin). Our in vitro and in vivo results suggested that activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway and the inhibition of NF-kappa B were involved in the protective effects of icariin on LPS-induced acute inflammatory responses. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据