4.7 Article

Cytotoxic efficacy of a novel dinuclear platinum(II) complex in human breast cancer cells

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 643, 期 1, 页码 34-41

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.06.022

关键词

Dinuclear platinum complex; DNA-binding; Breast cancer cell; Collagen biosynthesis; IGF-I receptor; NF-kappa B signaling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of a novel dinuclear platinum(II) complex of formula Pt-2(2-picoline)(4)(berenil)(2) employing a MTT assay and inhibition of[H-3]thymidine incorporation into DNA in both MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells demonstrated that the complex was more of a potent antiproliferative agent than cisplatin. The DNA-binding ability of Pt-2(2-picoline)(4)(berenil)(2) estimated by an ethidium displacement assay indicated that the complex showed strong specificity for AT base pairs in the minor groove of DNA. Our study showed that Pt-2(2-picoline)(4)(berenil)(2) was a potent catalytic inhibitor of topoisomerase II in opposition to cisplatin. Pt-2(2-picoline)(4)(berenil)(2) was found to be a more active inhibitor of collagen biosynthesis than cisplatin. The up regulation of beta(1)-integrin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) receptor expression by the complex was shown to be accompanied by an increase in the expression of mitogen activated protein kinases in breast cell lines. The phenomenon was related to the increased expression of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappa B) by Pt-2(2-picoline)(4) (berenil)(2) as shown by the Western immunoblot analysis. Flow cytometric analysis and a fluorescent microscopy assay demonstrated that cell death appeared to result from apoptosis, with the possibility of secondary necrosis. The data presented suggested that Pt-2(2-picoline)(4)(berenil)(2) impaired growth and metabolism of breast cancer cells more efficiently than cisplatin. These results indicated also the different properties of Pt-2(2-picoline)(4) (berenil)(2) and cisplatin. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据