4.7 Article

Different antinociceptive effects of botulinum toxin type A in inflammatory and peripheral polyneuropathic rat models

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 617, 期 1-3, 页码 48-53

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.06.047

关键词

Pain; Dysport (R); Botox (R); Paclitaxel; Carrageenan; Botulinum toxin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to inhibition of acetylcholine release in the neuromuscular junction botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) also inhibits the release of mediators involved in pain perception. We have investigated the effect of two types of BoNT-A on mechanical hyperalgesia in the rat models of carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia and of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. A subplantar (s.p.) injection of BoNT-A in the ipsilateral hindpaw 3 days before carrageenan administration reduced hypersensitivity. Dysport (R) and Botox (R) elicited comparable antihyperalgesic effects. Dysport (R) up to 30 U/kg and Botox (R) up to 20 U/kg did not impair the rat withdrawal nociceptive reflex or the locomotor performance as assessed by the rotarod test. Intraperitoneal administration of the skeletal muscle relaxant dantrolene produced, in contrast to BoNT-A, more motor impairment than analgesia. Paclitaxel treatment resulted in a peripheral neuropathy that affected the two hindpaws. Injection of 20 U/kg (s.p.) Dysport (R) produced a significant anti hyperalgesic effect in the injected paw of neuropathic animals 3 days after administration. Unexpectedly, a similar analgesic effect was observed in the contralateral paw. The same results were also observed when Botox (R) was used instead of Dysport (R). In contrast, a contralateral administration of Dysport (R) in the carrageenan test was ineffective. We conclude that BoNT-A elicits antinociceptive effects independent of the effects on muscular relaxation. Our results suggest that different mechanisms of action are responsible for the effect of BoNT-A in inflammatory and peripheral polyneuropathic rat models. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据