4.7 Article

α2-Adrenoceptor agonist xylazine induces peripheral antinociceptive effect by activation of the L-arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic GMP pathway in rat

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 613, 期 1-3, 页码 64-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.04.031

关键词

Xylazine; alpha(2)-Adrenoceptor; Nitric oxide; Cyclic GMP; Peripheral antinociception

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq) [476685/2004-4]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The L-arginine/nitric oxide/cyclic GMP pathway has been proposed as the mechanism of action for peripheral antinociception concerning several groups of drugs, including opioids and nonsteroidal analgesics. The aim of the present study was to investigate the involvement of the L-arginine/NO/cGMP pathway on antinociception induced by xylazine, an alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist extensively used in veterinary medicine and animal experimentation. The rat paw pressure test was used by inducing hyperalgesia via intraplantar injection of prostaglandin E-2 (2 mu g). Xylazine was administered locally into the right hind paw (25, 50 and 100 mu g) and either NO synthase inhibitor L-NOarg (12,18 and 24 mu g/paw), soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor ODQ (25, 50 and 100 mu g/paw) or cGMP-phosphodiesterase inhibitor zaprinast (50 mu g/paw) were previously administered to the right hind paw of Wistar rats. Xylazine administration elicited a local antinociceptive effect, since only much higher doses produce a systemic effect in the contralateral paw. The peripheral antinociceptive effect induced by xylazine (100 mu g/paw) was antagonized by L-NOarg and by ODQ; however. zaprinast potentiated the antinociceptive effect of xylazine at 25 mu g/paw. The results provide evidence that xylazine probably induces peripheral antinociceptive effect by L-arginine/NO/cGMP pathway activation. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据