4.7 Article

Myocardial protection by F 15845, a persistent sodium current blocker, in an ischemia-reperfusion model in the pig

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 624, 期 1-3, 页码 16-22

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.09.032

关键词

Ischemia-reperfusion; Myocardial infarction; Persistent sodium current blocker

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The specific persistent sodium current blocker F 15845 was tested in two myocardial ischemia-reperfusion models in the pig in order to evaluate its cardioprotective effects. In the first protocol, the left circumflex coronary artery was ligated for 60-min and then reperfused for 48-h. F 15845 (2.5 + 2.5 and 5 + 5 mg/kg) was administered by i.v. infusion, starting before ischemia to the beginning of reperfusion. The second protocol attempted to evaluate F 15845 (5 + 5 mg/kg) response in a more pathological state of the heart. To this end, a non necrotic ligation of the left circumflex coronary artery was applied for 15 min one week before the actual 60 min occlusion. For both protocols, infarct size was determined at the end of the reperfusion period and was assessed by histochemistry (tetrazolium staining). Plasma levels of biochemical markers (myoglobin and troponin I) were also evaluated. In protocol 1, F 15845 significantly reduced the infarct size by 27 +/- 3 and 43 +/- 5% at 2.5 + 2.5 and 5 + 5 mg/kg, respectively. At 5 + 5 mg/kg, F 15845 decreased plasma levels of myoglobin and cardiac troponin I. In protocol 2, F 15845 (5 + 5 mg/kg) significantly reduced myocardial infarct size by 54 15% and lowered the plasma myoglobin and troponin I levels relative to vehicle-treated animals. In conclusion, the highly effective persistent sodium current blocker F 15845 exerts remarkable cardioprotective activities. It reduces both myocardial infarct size and the release of biochemical markers in healthy pigs as well in pigs previously exposed to an ischemic episode. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据