4.7 Article

The angiotensin-(1-7) receptor agonist AVE0991 is cardioprotective in diabetic rats

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 590, 期 1-3, 页码 276-280

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.05.024

关键词

angiotensin-(1-7); diabetes; systolic dysfunction; renin angiotensin system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiotensin-(1-7) is associated with beneficial effects in cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we determined the effect of AVE0991, a nonpeptide angiotensin-(1-7) receptor agonist, on cardiac function in an animal model of diabetes mellitus type I. Diabetes was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats by a single injection of streptozotocin (70 mg/kg). Diabetic and non-diabetic animals were fed with AVE0991 (20 mg/kg per day) or control chow. Normoglycemic control chow- or AVE0991 -fed rats served as controls (n = 10/group). After five weeks, metabolic cage experiments were performed to assess metabolic parameters. Six weeks after induction of diabetes, cardiac function was monitored using a Millar-tip catheter system. AVE0991 had no effect on any of the investigated hemodynamic parameters under normoglycemic conditions. Hyperglycemia was comparable in diabetic animals with or without AVE0991 treatment. Diabetic control rats suffered from severe systolic dysfunction, indicated by a significant decrease in heart rate, left ventricular systolic pressure, systolic blood pressure and an impairment of left ventricular contractility. Administration of AVE0991 clearly rescued cardiac function under diabetic conditions as indicated by a normalisation of blood pressure and contractility parameters. Our data demonstrates a dominant beneficial impact of AVE0991 on the diabetic heart, implying a cardioprotective role for angiotensin(1-7) under hyperglycemic conditions and thus pointing to new therapeutic strategies using angiotensin-(1-7) agonists to treat cardiovascular complications in diabetes mellitus. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据