4.7 Article

Anti-Aβ-MAb and dually decorated nanoliposomes: Effect of Aβ1-42 peptides on interaction with hCMEC/D3 cells

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.02.006

关键词

Targeting; Amyloid; Abeta peptides; RAGE; Blood-brain barrier; Transcytosis

资金

  1. European Community [212043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-A beta-MAb (A beta-MAb)-decorated immunoliposomes (LIP) and dually decorated ones (dd-LIP) with OX-26 and A beta-MAb were constructed. In both cases, the biotin-streptavidin ligation method was applied. All LIP types were characterized for size distribution, zeta potential, and integrity during incubation with serum proteins. Uptake and transcytosis of both LIP types and control vesicles by human brain endothelial hCMEC/D3 cells were measured. All LIP types had mean diameters below 150-200 nm and low polydispersity. A beta-MAb-LIP uptake was higher than control PEGylated liposomes, while uptake of dd-LIP was similar to that of OX-26-LIP. A beta-MAb-LIP and dd-LIP uptake increased significantly when cells were pre-incubated with A beta 1-42 peptides; OX-26-LIP uptake was not modulated. Transcytosis of A beta-MAb-LIP through monolayers was 2.5 times higher when monolayers were pre-incubated with A beta 1-42. Transport of both probes, FITC-dextran and rhodamine-lipid, was equivalent, indicating that A beta-MAb-LIP are transferred intact through the BBB model. The A beta peptide-induced increase in binding (and transport) is regulated by the membrane receptors for A beta 1-42 peptides (RAGE), as proven after blocking RAGE by a specific MAb. A beta 1-42 peptides did not modulate the barrier tightness and integrity, as determined by transendothelial resistance and Lucifer Yellow permeability. Additionally, hCMEC/D3 cell viability was not affected by A beta peptides or by A beta-MAb-LIP. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据