4.7 Article

Injectable poly(organophosphazene)-camptothecin conjugate hydrogels: Synthesis, characterization, and antitumor activities

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.04.008

关键词

Antitumor activity; Poly(organophosphazene); Thermosensitive hydrogel; Polymer-drug conjugate; Stability of camptothecin

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology in Korea
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2E2271] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-50197, 전06A1101] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study is to develop an effective polymer therapeutics involving camptothecin (CPT) with enhanced efficacy and lessened systemic side-toxicity for cancer treatment. Polymer-CPT conjugates (PCCs), which consisted of CPT-20-glycinate and poly(organophosphazene) bearing carboxylic acid, were synthesized, characterized for physicochemical properties, in vitro degradation and CPT release behaviors from the PCC, and evaluated their anticancer activity. The aqueous solutions of all these PCCs showed a thermo-responsive sol-gel transition behavior for injectable application near room temperature. The CPT incorporated into the hydrogel was proven to be stable in vitro over 15 days. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the PCC was verified to be effective against four kinds of human cancer cell lines. The in vivo anticancer activity study with HT-29 colon cancer cell xenografted mice showed that the intratumorally injected PCC hydrogel inhibited the tumor growth more effectively relative to CPT alone (-29% vs. 130% in tumor size). Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据