4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Particle size-dependent and surface charge-dependent biodistribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.029

关键词

Gold nanoparticles; Intravenous injection; Female Wistar-Kyoto rat; In vivo biodistribution; Nanoparticle size and surface charge; Hepato-biliary and renal clearance

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL070542-01A1, R01 HL070542-04, R01 HL070542, R01 HL070542-05, HL074022, R01 HL074022, R01 HL070542-03, R01 HL070542-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gold nanoparticles (GNP) provide many opportunities in imaging, diagnostics, and therapies of nanomedicine. Hence, their biokinetics in the body are prerequisites for specific tailoring of nanomedicinal applications and for a comprehensive risk assessment. We administered Au-198-radio-labelled monodisperse, negatively charged GNP of five different sizes (1.4, 5, 18, 80, and 200 nm) and 2.8 nm GNP with opposite surface charges by intravenous injection into rats. After 24 h, the biodistribution of the GNP was quantitatively measured by gamma-spectrometry. The size and surface charge of GNP strongly determine the biodistribution. Most GNP accumulated in the liver increased from 50% of 1.4 nm GNP to >99% of 200 nm GNP. In contrast, there was little size-dependent accumulation of 18-200 nm GNP in most other organs. However, for GNP between 1.4 nm and 5 nm, the accumulation increased sharply with decreasing size: i.e. a linear increase with the volumetric specific surface area. The differently charged 2.8 nm GNP led to significantly different accumulations in several organs. We conclude that the alterations of accumulation in the various organs and tissues, depending on GNP size and surface charge, are mediated by dynamic protein binding and exchange. A better understanding of these mechanisms will improve drug delivery and dose estimates used in risk assessment. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据