4.7 Article

Gellan gum blended PEI nanocomposites as gene delivery agents: Evidences from in vitro and in vivo studies

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.01.009

关键词

Gellan gum; PEI; Primary mouse keratinocytes; Drosophila melanogaster; Gene delivery; In vivo

资金

  1. CSIR [NWP 035]
  2. UGC-SRF [10-2(05)2006(i)-E.U.II]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Branched Polyethylenimine, 25 kDa (PEI), was blended with gellan gum, an anionic heteropolysaccharide, for partial neutralization of its excess positive charge to form gellan gum-polyethylenimine (GP) nanocomposites (NCs). Subsequently, we manipulated the amount of gellan gum for obtaining a series of NCs and characterized them for their size, charge and morphology. Among all the NCs, one member, named GP3, showed the best transfection efficiency in tested cell lines in comparison with the rest of the series, PEI, Lipofectamine and other commercial transfection agents and also exhibited minimum cytotoxicity. It was found to transfect primary cells of mouse skin with better efficiency than PEI and Lipofectamine and was able to protect the plasmid DNA from nucleases and serum proteins present in the blood. GP3 exhibited efficient intracellular delivery of plasmid as revealed by confocal studies while its intracellular presence was also confirmed by the knockdown of GFP expression (using GFP specific siRNA) and JNKII by quantifying proteins in cell lysates and by western blotting and hybridization, respectively. In vivo cytotoxicity studies in Drosophila showed lack of induction of stress response in the exposed organisms. Further, exposed organisms did not show any developmental delay or mortality and no morphological defects' were observed in the emerged flies. In vivo gene expression studies in Balb/c mice revealed maximum expression of luciferase enzyme in spleen. The study suggests that GP3 may act as an efficient non-viral gene carrier with diverse biomedical applications. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据