4.7 Article

Development of new lipid-based paclitaxel nanoparticles using sequential simplex optimization

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.11.012

关键词

Experimental design; Cancer; Nanocapsule; Cytotoxicity; Lyophilization

资金

  1. NIH-NCI [R01 CA115197]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of these Studies was to develop Cremophor-free lipid-based paclitaxel (PX) nanoparticle formulations prepared from warm microemulsion precursors. To identify and optimize new nanoparticles, experimental design was performed combining Taguchi array and sequential simplex optimization. The combination of Taguchi array and sequential simplex optimization efficiently directed the design of paclitaxel nanoparticles. Two optimized paclitaxel nanoparticles (NPs) were obtained: G78 NPs composed of glyceryl tridodecanoate (GT) and polyoxyethylene 20-stearyl ether (Brij 78), and BTM NPs composed of Miglyol 812, Brij 78, and D-alpha-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS). Both nanoparticles Successfully entrapped paclitaxel at a final concentration of 150 mu g/ml (over 6% drug loading) with particle sizes less than 200 nm and over 85% of entrapment efficiency. These novel paclitaxel nanoparticles were stable at 4 degrees C over five months and in PBS at 37 degrees C over 102 h as measured by physical stability. Release of paclitaxel was slow and sustained without initial burst release. Cytotoxicity studies in MDA-MB-231 cancer cells showed that both nanoparticles have similar anticancer activities compared to Taxol(R). Interestingly, PX BTM nanocapsules could be lyophilized without cryoprotectants. The lyophilized powder comprised only of PX BTM NPs in water Could be rapidly rehydrated with a complete retention of original physicochemical properties, in vitro release properties, and cytotoxicity profile. Sequential Simplex Optimization has been utilized to identify promising new lipid-based paclitaxel nanoparticles having useful attributes. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据