4.6 Article

Antiinflammatory effects of matrine in LPS-induced acute lung injury in mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 573-579

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.09.020

关键词

Matrine; Lipopolysaccharide; Acute lung injury; Cytokine; Reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81000017]
  2. Key Laboratory of High Altitude Medicine (Third Military Medical University), Ministry of Education [2009GK01, 2009GK02]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2010JQ4005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matrine is one of the main active components of Chinese herb Sophora flavescens Ait (Kushen), which has been demonstrated to be effective in suppressing inflammation. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of matrine on LPS-induced lung injury. Lung injury was assessed by histological study and wet to dry weight ratios, as well as cell count and protein content in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. We also detected MPO activity reflecting neutrophil infiltration and MDA activity examining oxidative stress in lung tissues. Cytokines and ROS production in cells were monitored by ELISA and flow cytometry, respectively. The results showed that high dose of matrine significantly reduced the mortality rate of mice with LPS administration. Treatment with matrine improved LPS-induced lung histopathologic changes, alleviated pulmonary edema and lung vascular leak, inhibited MPO and MDA activity,and reduced the production of inflammatory mediators including TNF-alpha, IL-6 and HMGB1. In vitro, matrine administration reduced the production of ROS and inflammatory factors, which was possibly associated with inhibition of NF-kappa B. In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that matrine exhibited a protective effect on LPS-induced acute lung injury by inhibiting of the inflammatory response, which may involve the suppression of ROS and tissue oxidative stress. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据