4.6 Article

An investigation into the role of mucus thickness on mucoadhesion in the gastrointestinal tract of pig

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 335-341

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.04.007

关键词

Carbomer; Tensile testing; Bioadhesion; Mucoadhesion; Gastrointestinal transit; Mucus; Mucus staining

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal [SFRH/BD/30160/2006]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/30160/2006] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mucoadhesion in the gastrointestinal tract is a complex phenomenon and both formulation and physiological features need to be well understood and considered. Mucus thickness has been inferred to play a role in this process; however no definitive influence has been established. This study aimed to investigate the influence of mucus thickness on the mucoadhesion process, using a large animal (pig) as a model to closely resemble the human physiological features. The mucus thickness of different regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pig was fully measured by means of a histochemical method (hematoxilin/eosin) employing cryostat sections. Mucoadhesion was evaluated ex vivo on porcine mucosa by tensiometry using a polyacrylic acid polymer (Carbopol 974P NF) as a mucoadhesive model material, both in a dry and swollen state. Mucus was thickest in the stomach (body 67.9 +/- 54.7 mu m) and mucus thickness increased from proximal to distal segments in both the small intestine (duodenum 25.9 +/- 11.8 mu m, ileum 31.0 +/- 15.7 mu m) and large intestine (caecum 19.4 +/- 8.7 mu m, ascending colon 31.9 +/- 17.2 mu m, descending colon 35.1 +/- 16.0 mu m and rectum 40.8 +/- 12.5 mu m). Swollen polymer exhibited lower mucoadhesion than the dry form in all sections analysed. Mucus thickness plays a role on the mucoadhesion, as thicker mucus provides deeper polymer chain diffusion and entanglements; however, other factors are also involved in this complex process. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据