4.6 Article

Treatment of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection with intravenous ganciclovir followed by long-term oral valganciclovir

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 169, 期 9, 页码 1061-1067

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-010-1176-9

关键词

Ganciclovir; Valganciclovir; Congenital CMV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital cytomegalovirus infection is the most common cause of nonhereditary sensorineural hearing loss and an important cause of psychomotor retardation. Earlier studies showed that 6-weeks' treatment with ganciclovir, starting in the neonatal period, prevented hearing deterioration at 6 months, but in one-fifth of the infants, the effect was not sustained at age 12 months. The aim of this preliminary retrospective study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of long-term treatment with ganciclovir/valganciclovir for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Twenty-three infants with culture-proven symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection were treated with ganciclovir for 6 weeks followed by oral valganciclovir to age 12 months. Audiometry was performed at least three times in the first year, in addition to physical examination including neurological and developmental assessment. At age a parts per thousand yen1 year, hearing was normal in 76% of affected ears compared to baseline (54%). In 25 normal ears at birth no deterioration was found at a parts per thousand yen1 year. These results were significantly better than reported in a historical control group of similar infants treated for 6 weeks only (P= 0.001). Viral load monitoring demonstrated sustained virological response. Four of the children (18%) had mental retardation. The main side effect of treatment was transient neutropenia. In conclusion, prolonged therapy of symptomatic congenital CMV infection with intravenous ganciclovir followed by oral valganciclovir is safe, and it appears to lead to a better auditory outcome than short-term treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据