4.4 Article

The MOBID-2 pain scale: Reliability and responsiveness to pain in patients with dementia

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 1419-1430

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.507

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council [189439]
  2. University of Bergen [09/1568]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundMobilization-Observation-Behavior-Intensity-Dementia-2 (MOBID-2) pain scale is a staff-administered pain tool for patients with dementia. This study explores MOBID-2's test-retest reliability, measurement error and responsiveness to change. MethodsAnalyses are based upon data from a cluster randomized trial including 352 patients with advanced dementia from 18 Norwegian nursing homes. Test-retest reliability between baseline and week 2 (n=163), and weeks 2 and 4 (n=159) was examined in patients not expected to change (controls), using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2.1), standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Responsiveness was examined by testing six priori-formulated hypotheses about the association between change scores on MOBID-2 and other outcome measures. ResultsICCs of the total MOBID-2 scores were 0.81 (0-2 weeks) and 0.85 (2-4 weeks). SEM and SDC were 1.9 and 3.1 (0-2 weeks) and 1.4 and 2.3 (2-4 weeks), respectively. Five out of six hypotheses were confirmed: MOBID-2 discriminated (p<0.001) between change in patients with and without a stepwise protocol for treatment of pain (SPTP). Moderate association (r=0.35) was demonstrated with Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, and no association with Mini-Mental State Examination, Functional Assessment Staging and Activity of Daily Living. Expected associations between change scores of MOBID-2 and Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home version were not confirmed. ConclusionThe SEM and SDC in connection with the MOBID-2 pain scale indicate that the instrument is responsive to a decrease in pain after a SPTP. Satisfactory test-retest reliability across test periods was demonstrated. Change scores3 on total and subscales are clinically relevant and are beyond measurement error.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据